KB/vb/787867/classdiagram.jpg' alt='Vb Net Serialize And Deserialize Objects And Elements' title='Vb Net Serialize And Deserialize Objects And Elements' />I have a simple keyvalue list in JSON being sent back to ASP. NET via POST. Example key1 value1, key2 value2 I AM NOT TRYING TO DESERIALIZE INTO. Is it possible to return a dynamic object from a json deserialization using json. I would like to do something like this dynamic jsonResponse JsonConvert. FAQ Technical Mono. Mono Runtime. Where can I find the Technical Documentation to the Mono RuntimeThe documentation that used to be available on the monodocs directory is now being moved into this web site and is available in the Runtime Documentation section. Mono Platforms. What operating systems does Mono run on Mono runs on Linux, UNIX and Windows systems. For a more detailed list, see the Supported Platforms page. Is Mono Binary Compatible with Windows Yes, Mono is binary compatible with Windows. Which means that you can run binaries produced by. NET compilers from Microsoft and other vendors. When porting your applications, you should make sure that you test its functionality as differences in the underlying operating system and differences in the VM implementations bugs, missing features might affect your application. Mono does not have every. NET API implemented and when executing a binary from Windows that consumes an unimplemented API you might get an obscure message about tokens not being found. In these cases it is useful to compile your application with Monos C compiler just to ensure that you are consuming APIs that are supported. This is not a perfect solution, as some APIs in Mono throw Not. Implemented. Exceptions in certain cases, so you still should test your application with Mono. If you care about application portability, check Mo. MA, the migration analyzer. Are there any reasons to build on Mono instead of using Visual Studio and copying the binaries In general, you can continue to use Visual Studio to write your code if you feel comfortable doing so. Using Linux to develop will encourage you to test your software on Linux more frequently and if you have the chance, it will also help you to dogfood your own product. Jonathan Pryor adds The benefit is that you can more easily know which APIs exist vs. In general, if an API doesnt exist within Mono, we try NOT to provide the method within the assembly with a default version throwing Not. Implemeted. Exception, so that you can use gmcs compile to determine if all the APIs you use actually exist. This isnt always possible, so there are several instances where a Not. Implemented. Exception is thrown, but when a NIE can be avoided by omitting the member, the member is omitted. The alternative is to build under. NET and run under Mono, which leaves you more at the mercy of Not. Implemented. Exceptions or Missing. Memember. Exception. A decent regression test platform should find these issues, so this might not be an actual problem. Can I run Mono applications without using mono program. Yes, this is possible on Linux systems, to do this, use something like if CLR M MZ usrbinmono procsysfsbinfmtmiscregister. No binfmtmisc support exit 1. This practice is discouraged as it is not portable. It is better to follow the pattern described in the Application Deployment Guidelines and use a wrapper script to invoke Mono. That has several advantages portability, ability to write relocatable applications, avoiding pollution of bin directories and allowing for flags and options to be passed to Mono. If you create software with Mono. Develop and you have selected Unix Integration, the scripts will be generated by default. What architectures does Mono support See our Supported Platforms page. Can Mono run on Windows 9x, or ME editionsMono has not been compiled on Windows 9x or ME for many years and it is not actively developed or maintained on that configuration. That being said, the following information is from the days of Mono 1. Mono requires Unicode versions of Win. APIs to run, and only a handful of the W functions is supported under Win. There is Microsoft Layer for Unicode that provides implementation of these APIs on 9x systems. Unfortunately it uses linker trick for delayed load that is not supported by ld, so some sort of adapter is necessary. You will need MSLU and one of the following libs to link Mono to unicows. Why support Windows, when you can run the real thing There are various reasons Supporting Windows helps us identify the portable portions of Mono from the non portable versions of it, helping Mono become more portable in the future. It assists us since we can isolate problems in Mono by partitioning the problem is it a runtime issue, or an OS issue. About half the contributors to Mono are Windows developers. They have many different reasons for contributing to the effort, and we find it very important to let those developers run the runtime on Windows without forcing them to use a new operating system. Mono does not heavily modify the windows registry, update system DLLs, install DLLs to the WindowsSystem. It helps Windows based developers to test their code under Mono before they deploy into Linux. Mono and applications that embed Mono can be deployed without an installer you can xcopy deploy your application and the required Mono files without installing the. NET runtime. Some applications and libraries premise pair or more of applications, such as clients and servers. Windows version helps mixed solutions of. NET and Mono easier, for example by running one on. NET and one on Mono locally on Windows. A reader comments In other words, I knew Mono would not cause. However. our CIO is against it because of the. Windows 2. 00. 0. Another user comments By the way, the Mono libraries. MB so fit easily. How to detect the execution platform  The execution platform can be detected by using the System. Environment. OSVersion. Platform value. However correctly detecting Unix platforms, in every cases, requires a little more work. The first versions of the framework 1. Platform. ID value for Unix, so Mono used the value 1. The newer framework 2. Unix to the Platform. ID enum but, sadly, with a different value 4 and newer versions of. NET distinguished between Unix and Mac. OS X, introducing yet another value 6 for Mac. OS X. This means that in order to detect properly code running on Unix platforms you must check the three values 4, 6 and 1. This ensure that the detection code will work as expected when executed on Mono CLR 1. Mono and Microsoft CLR 2. System. class Program. Main. int p int Environment. OSVersion. Platform. Console. Write. Line Running on Unix. Console. Write. Line NOT running on Unix. Notice that as of Mono 2. Mac. OS X is still 4 for legacy reasons, too much code was written between the time that the Mac. OSX value was introduced and the time that we wrote this text which has lead to a lot of user code in the wild to not cope with the newly introduced value. A better way of testing for Unixness is to make tests that are feature specific instead of dividing the code in Unix vs Windows. For example, for file system operations, it is better to use the path character separator and compare it for or as that would not depend on the actual enumeration value. How can I detect if am running in Mono Having code that depends on the underlying runtime is considered to be bad coding style, but sometimes such code is necessary to work around runtime bugs. The supported way of detecting Mono is using System. Program. static void Main. Type t Type. Get. Type Mono. Runtime. Console. Write. Line You are running with the Mono VM. Console. Write. Line You are running something else. Any other hack, such as checking the underlying type of System. Int. 32 or of other corlib types, is doomed to fail in the future. How can I detect if my code is compiled by the Mono mcs compiler Having code that depends on the underlying compiler is considered to be bad coding style, but sometimes such code is necessary. You can do it by checking the special Mono. CS symbol using System. Program. static void Main. Console. Write. Line Compiled with the Mono compiler. Console. Write. Line Compiled with something else. Does Mono run on very small systems. Security Considerations for Data Microsoft Docs. When dealing with data in Windows Communication Foundation WCF, you must consider a number of threat categories. The following table lists the most important threat classes that relate to data processing. WCF provides tools to mitigate these threats. Denial of service. When receiving untrusted data, the data may cause the receiving side to access a disproportionate amount of various resources, such as memory, threads, available connections, or processor cycles by causing lengthy computations. A denial of service attack against a server may cause it to crash and be unable to process messages from other, legitimate clients. Malicious code execution. Incoming untrusted data causes the receiving side to run code it did not intend to. Information disclosure. The remote attacker forces the receiving party to respond to its requests in such a way as to disclose more information than it intends to. User Provided Code and Code Access Security A number of places in the Windows Communication Foundation WCF infrastructure run code that is provided by the user. For example, the Data. Contract. Serializer serialization engine may call user provided property set accessors and get accessors. The WCF channel infrastructure may also call into user provided derived classes of the Message class. It is the responsibility of the code author to ensure that no security vulnerabilities exist. For example, if you create a data contract type with a data member property of type integer, and in the set accessor implementation allocate an array based on the property value, you expose the possibility of a denial of service attack if a malicious message contains an extremely large value for this data member. In general, avoid any allocations based on incoming data or lengthy processing in user provided code especially if lengthy processing can be caused by a small amount of incoming data. When performing security analysis of user provided code, make sure to also consider all failure cases that is, all code branches where exceptions are thrown. The ultimate example of user provided code is the code inside your service implementation for each operation. The security of your service implementation is your responsibility. It is easy to inadvertently create insecure operation implementations that may result in denial of service vulnerabilities. For example, an operation that takes a string and returns the list of customers from a database whose name starts with that string. If you are working with a large database and the string being passed is just a single letter, your code may attempt to create a message larger than all available memory, causing the entire service to fail. An Out. Of. Memory. Exception is not recoverable in the. NET Framework and always results in the termination of your application. You should ensure that no malicious code is plugged in to the various extensibility points. This is especially relevant when running under partial trust, dealing with types from partially trusted assemblies, or creating components usable by partially trusted code. For more information, see Partial Trust Threats in a later section. Note that when running in partial trust, the data contract serialization infrastructure supports only a limited subset of the data contract programming model for example, private data members or types using the Serializable. Attribute attribute are not supported. For more information, see Partial Trust. Avoiding Unintentional Information Disclosure When designing serializable types with security in mind, information disclosure is a possible concern. Consider the following points The Data. Contract. Serializer programming model allows the exposure of private and internal data outside of the type or assembly during serialization. Additionally, the shape of a type can be exposed during schema export. Be sure to understand your types serialization projection. If you do not want anything exposed, disable serializing it for example, by not applying the Data. Member. Attribute attribute in the case of a data contract. Be aware that the same type may have multiple serialization projections, depending on the serializer in use. The same type may expose one set of data when used with the Data. Contract. Serializer and another set of data when used with the Xml. Serializer. Accidentally using the wrong serializer may lead to information disclosure. Using the Xml. Serializer in legacy remote procedure call RPCencoded mode may unintentionally expose the shape of the object graph on the sending side to the receiving side. Preventing Denial of Service Attacks. Quotas Causing the receiving side to allocate a significant amount of memory is a potential denial of service attack. While this section concentrates on memory consumption issues arising from large messages, other attacks may occur. For example, messages may use a disproportionate amount of processing time. Denial of service attacks are usually mitigated using quotas. When a quota is exceeded, a Quota. Exceeded. Exception exception is normally thrown. Without the quota, a malicious message may cause all available memory to be accessed, resulting in an Out. Of. Memory. Exception exception, or all available stacks to be accessed, resulting in a Stack. Overflow. Exception. The quota exceeded scenario is recoverable if encountered in a running service, the message currently being processed is discarded and the service keeps running and processes further messages. The out of memory and stack overflow scenarios, however, are not recoverable anywhere in the. NET Framework the service terminates if it encounters such exceptions. Quotas in WCF do not involve any pre allocation. For example, if the Max. Received. Message. Size quota found on various classes is set to 1. KB, it does not mean that 1. KB is automatically allocated for each message. The actual amount allocated depends on the actual incoming message size. Many quotas are available at the transport layer. These are quotas enforced by the specific transport channel in use HTTP, TCP, and so on. While this topic discusses some of these quotas, these quotas are described in detail in Transport Quotas. Hashtable Vulnerability A vulnerability exists when data contracts contain hashtables or collections. The problem occurs if a large number of values are inserted into a hashtable where a large number of those values generate the same hash value. This can be used as a DOS attack. This vulnerability can be mitigated by setting the Max. Recieved. Message. Size binding quota. Care must be taken while setting this quota in order to prevent such attacks. This quota puts an upper limit on the size of WCF message. Additionally, avoid using hashtables or collections in your data contracts. Limiting Memory Consumption Without Streaming The security model around large messages depends on whether streaming is in use. Blackberry Software Downloads 2 Telcel Usa. In the basic, non streamed case, messages are buffered into memory. In this case, use the Max. Received. Message. Size quota on the Transport. Binding. Element or on the system provided bindings to protect against large messages by limiting the maximum message size to access. Note that a service may be processing multiple messages at the same time, in which case they are all in memory. Use the throttling feature to mitigate this threat. Also note that Max. Received. Message. Size does not place an upper bound on per message memory consumption, but limits it to within a constant factor. For example, if the Max. Received. Message. Size is 1 MB and a 1 MB message is received and then deserialized, additional memory is required to contain the deserialized object graph, resulting in total memory consumption well over 1 MB. For this reason, avoid creating serializable types that could result in significant memory consumption without much incoming data. For example, a data contract My. Contract with 5. XML construction lt My.